Ask most laboratories how they specify a synthetic peptide and the answer is a single number: purity ≥98% by HPLC.

The figure is familiar, easy to compare across suppliers and simple to print on a certificate of analysis.
It is also, on its own, a poor specification. Two lots can both report 98.2% and still differ in ways that matter to an experiment or a development programme.
One may carry 1.8% spread across a dozen minor, well-characterised species.
The other may contain a single 1.5% deletion sequence that coelutes with a neighbouring peak and differs from the target by one amino acid. The purity number is identical; the material is not.
In this article, Sohail Khan argues that, for peptides made by solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS), the impurity profile is the specification.
The purity figure is only a summary of it. The discussion is framed around research-grade and early-development material and makes no claims about clinical or human use.